Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Reliability?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:13:46 -0800
On Feb 19, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Boaz Galil wrote:
Is there a way to know when the machine will run out of memory? (for example running Tshark for 1 hour = leak XMB.. or something like that.)
No. The amount of memory it accumulates depends on the traffic.
tcpdump is not part of the wireshark package,
Unless you're running on Windows, a random machine is, I suspect, more likely to have tcpdump on it than Wireshark. Several UN*Xes (*BSD, Mac OS X) come standard with tcpdump, and some other UN*Xes (at least some Linux distributions) include packages for both and *might* install tcpdump but not Wireshark by default. (On Windows, you'd have to download and install Wireshark *or* WinDump.)
is there any solution for long packet capture with wireshark package?
To quote my earlier message:
The way to avoid that issue is not to use Wireshark or TShark to do long-running captures, and to use dumpcap instead.
dumpcap *is* part of the Wireshark package (it's what Wireshark and TShark run in order to do capturing). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Reliability? Bob Carlson (Feb 18)
- Re: Reliability? Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: Reliability? Boaz Galil (Feb 19)
- Re: Reliability? Jaap Keuter (Feb 19)
- Re: Reliability? Guy Harris (Feb 19)
- Re: Reliability? Guy Harris (Feb 19)
- Re: Reliability? Boaz Galil (Feb 19)
- Re: Reliability? Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Reliability? Steve Smith (Feb 19)
- Re: Reliability? Bob Carlson (Feb 19)