Re: One NIC on public side

["mike () grounded net" <mike () grounded net>]

I had not thought of that.

Either way, I've done away with the hub in place of a switch now. I'll try putting a hub on the monitoring port again 
and see if that will allow me to connect multiple monitoring devices. For some reason, that didn't work before but as I 
think about that, I might have been using a switch and didn't notice it.

Mike


On Mon, 17 May 2010 07:52:48 +0200, Boonie wrote:
>  Have you checked the line speeds? A hub wil most likely behave as a switch
>  
>  if the speeds do not match.
>  
>  Maybe changing auto-negotiate on the PC to a fixed speeds could help.
>  
>  Dave
>  
>  
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: <mike () grounded net>
>  To: "wireshark-users" <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
>  Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 4:46 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] One NIC on public side
>  
>  
>  I did as suggested, taking all protocols off of the nic but that ends up
>  showing no traffic what so ever.
>  
>  
>  ___________________________________________________________________________
>  Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
>  Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
>  Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>  mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe