Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: N in 1 packets


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:59:37 -0800


On Dec 11, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Akos Vandra wrote:

FYI:  Anyways the format of those 16-byte frames are - pardon the
language - fucked up real bead, and a pain in the ass to understand
and decode. Anyways, to answer your questions: they do not contain any
interesting data, only that hey, here are another bunch of bytes, and
its sole purpose is to keep up synchronization between the target and
the tracer. If there is not enough data to be sent when the target
finishes sending the last 16-byte frame, it pads them out with
"zeroes". Actually it's not only zeroes, because of the lovely
encoding of it, but practically they are padding bytes. Timestamp
information is included within these 16-byte frames, along with the
messages.

OK, so does that mean that the time stamp for the 16-byte frame applies to all messages that begin in that frame?  For 
example, if a frame has two complete messages and the beginning of a third message, would the time stamp for the frame 
apply to all three of those messages?

If so, my inclination would be to have libpcap deliver messages rather than frames, and have it provide, for all 
messages that begin in a frame, the time stamp of the frame for the time stamp of the message.

I suppose (looking at only the sources, and mostly the socketcan
libpcap source) that I need to add a new linktype to my data source

Yes, you need to get a new link-layer header type value assigned, for libpcap to return.

You'd ask for that on the tcpdump-workers list; you'd need to have a description of the messages.  Right now, that's 
being discussed in this thread, so we might as well come up with the right message format here before you ask for the 
link-layer type.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: