Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Fragmentation
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:46:08 -0700
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:26:32PM +0530, Subhasree R wrote:
I am implementing one new protocol over TCP layer. I am implementing fragment_add_check() for fragmentation.
In this protocol, there was no sequence id, i.e 4th parameter.
The sequence number is used so that Wireshark knows what order to place the packets in because they may not arrive across the wire in order. Is there another way of telling the order of the packets? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Fragmentation Subhasree R (Feb 21)
- Re: Fragmentation Stephen Fisher (Feb 22)
- Re: Fragmentation David Aggeler (Feb 22)
- Re: Fragmentation Guy Harris (Feb 22)
- Re: Fragmentation Guy Harris (Feb 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fragmentation Philip Gladstone (Feb 23)