Wireshark mailing list archives
Is it still ok to create hidden items ?
From: Teto <mattator () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:54:17 +0200
Hi, Just had a question about what's the best practice. I have a packet with a field contianing several keywords. I intend to split those keywords so that one can filter display based upon a keyword. My problem is am compelled to display each keyword separately (one itemp per kewyord and group them in a subtree) or could I display all of them in one item in the main tree (my preference) and then create several hidden fields (one per keyword). I wonder if that last solution is good since I read in proto.h : /* HIDING PROTOCOL FIELDS IS DEPRECATED, IT'S CONSIDERED TO BE BAD GUI DESIGN! */ What would you advise me ? Matt ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? ronnie sahlberg (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Speck Michael EHWG AVL/GAE (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Jeff Morriss (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Roland Knall (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Anders Broman (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Roland Knall (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? ronnie sahlberg (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? ronnie sahlberg (Oct 27)