Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ?
From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:06:55 +1100
Hi, I think one of the reasons why one should avoid hidden items is that if they dont show up in the dissect pane, users might not be aware that they exist at all. And then they will not be able to use them. Wireshark supports so very many different filter fields that it is not practical to use a "list of all filterable items". So see it as "if they show up in the dissect pane, this is how you tell the users 'these fields exist, you can filter on them'" If they dont show up in the disset pane, no one will know about them or use them, i.e. they dont exist :-) regards ronnie sahlberg On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Teto <mattator () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, Just had a question about what's the best practice. I have a packet with a field contianing several keywords. I intend to split those keywords so that one can filter display based upon a keyword. My problem is am compelled to display each keyword separately (one itemp per kewyord and group them in a subtree) or could I display all of them in one item in the main tree (my preference) and then create several hidden fields (one per keyword). I wonder if that last solution is good since I read in proto.h : /* HIDING PROTOCOL FIELDS IS DEPRECATED, IT'S CONSIDERED TO BE BAD GUI DESIGN! */ What would you advise me ? Matt ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? ronnie sahlberg (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Speck Michael EHWG AVL/GAE (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Jeff Morriss (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Roland Knall (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Anders Broman (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Roland Knall (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? ronnie sahlberg (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? Teto (Oct 27)
- Re: Is it still ok to create hidden items ? ronnie sahlberg (Oct 27)