FW: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46479: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-per.c

[Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>]

Hi,
Would using proto_tree_add_bits_item() be less efficient? Possibly that can be improved which would give
A better over all improvement I think.
Regards
Anders 

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-commits-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-commits-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of 
martinm () wireshark org
Sent: den 9 december 2012 05:50
To: wireshark-commits () wireshark org
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46479: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-per.c

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=46479

User: martinm
Date: 2012/12/08 08:49 PM

Log:
 Similarly avoiding calling g_snprintf() in dissect_per_constrained_integer().

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
  Changes    Path            Action
  +7 -1      packet-per.c    Modified

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
             mailto:wireshark-commits-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe