Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Starting point for a developer
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 23:34:25 -0700
On May 26, 2012, at 9:56 PM, Dipanjan Das wrote:
I couldn't get you.
What I'm saying is that the "Starting point for a developer" mail message you sent: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201205/msg00198.html was the same as the "New developer - how to start?" mail message you sent: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201205/msg00190.html and, therefore, the answers are the same. Perhaps the first message, for some reason, didn't get delivered to the list as quickly as the second message, but the second one was sent about 47 minutes after the first one - just because a message doesn't show up on a list within an hour, that doesn't mean that it should be sent again. Perhaps you weren't subscribed to the wireshark-dev list, so the first message had to get approved by a moderator. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Starting point for a developer Dipanjan Das (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Guy Harris (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Aft nix (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Dipanjan Das (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Guy Harris (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Aft nix (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Dipanjan Das (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Guy Harris (May 26)
- Re: Starting point for a developer Guy Harris (May 26)