Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 42468: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-rlc-lte.c


From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:33:48 +0100

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:


On May 7, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Martin Mathieson wrote:

Sorry Guy, I just added it to the header file.  Shall I revert?

Actually, according to SVN, you didn't, you removed it from the .c file:


Oh dear.  I must have done 'svn commit packet-umts_fp.c packet-umts_fp.c'.


User: martinm
Date: 2012/05/07 10:10 AM

Log:
Include <epan/conversation.h> from packet-umts_fp.h.

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
 Changes    Path                Action
 +0 -1      packet-umts_fp.c    Modified
                           ^^

but didn't check in the change to add it to the .h file.

I'm somewhat neutral on whether the right way to handle this is to include
it in packet-umts_fp.h or in the files that include it.


I will do it in the .c files.  One reason might be that someone might
include that header file in their own project and doesn't want to have to
have the wireshark folder on their include path (I don't).



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: