Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Patches to properly handle extended responses for NTCreate&X


From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:19:53 +0200

Hi,

it is better to create a bug with your patch in BugTracker (
https://bugs.wireshark.org )
Regards,


On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com
wrote:

Hi,

Attached is a patch to handle extended responses for NTCreate&X
requests for CIFS.

I have tested this patch with captures I have and it seems to decode
the additional information correctly.

Could someone with commit privileges either push it or let me know
what changes are needed please?

--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: