Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs
From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:12:10 -0500
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Martin Mathieson < martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Martin Mathieson < martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com> wrote:On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Alexander Koeppe <format_c () online de>wrote:Am 14.11.2012 15:53, schrieb Martin Mathieson:On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Cristian Constantin <const.crist () googlemail com <mailto:const.crist () googlemail com>> wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Alexander Koeppe <format_c () online de <mailto:format_c () online de>> wrote: > Am 12.11.2012 11:41, schrieb Cristian Constantin: >> hi! >> >> I am just a bit confused about the way the tcp graphs are presented to >> the user. >> I am using debian/Version 1.6.5 >> >> 1. tcp. if one selects (for example): >> >> Statistics/TCP Stream Graph/Window Scaling Graph >> >> from the main menu, one gets the graph from the perspective ofthe>> endpoint which is >> represented by source ip address, source ip port of the frame containing >> the tcp segment >> selected in the main wireshark window, right? > > Right. As the source can only tell something about the window available > on it's end in the ACK packages, this selection has being used to graph > the values. It's up to the user choosing the right direction asit has> been done with the other graphs (let along the oposite direction of the > values graphed in the other graphs). cristian: yes, but my point was that for sctp this is done in amuchmore intuitive fashion, which imo is more user friendly. > >> for getting the graph for the other endpoint, I have to closethe>> current graph and select a tcp >> segment with the source ip/port of the other endpoint and select again: >> >> Statistics/TCP Stream Graph/Window Scaling Graph >> >> wouldn't have been more intuitive and easier to use (from theuser>> perspective) changing the >> graph dynamically when another source endpoint is selected inthemain >> window? or to present >> such a choice in the tcp graph windows? > > You mean to add a option to the graph control window, fired upin the> background to toggle between the direction? > crisitian: yes, something like that. from what I understand from martin this should be available in newer versions. You don't get to flip the direction inside the graph window, but youcannow also launch the graph in either direction from the conversation table window (see screenshot). You could find the TCP connection that you are interested in, then click both graph buttons to launch bothgraphs.Regards, Martin___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe Nice, but when I want to switch between the different graph types, wireshark crashes with a segfault. Do you experience the same or is it more related to a local problem on my side? I just had to replace a faulty harddisk with the OS on it. Cheers AlexI just managed to cause a crash by switching to 'throuput' in the direction where no traffic was transmitted... I'll take a look. MartinI just submitted a fix for the problem I could see in r46079 (wasn't allocating enough elements for a tput graph, so was going off the end of the array trying to add new ellipses). Martin
Alex, do you still see crashes when switching graph type? Martin
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Cristian Constantin (Nov 12)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 12)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Cristian Constantin (Nov 12)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 12)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Cristian Constantin (Nov 12)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Alexander Koeppe (Nov 13)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Cristian Constantin (Nov 14)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 14)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Alexander Koeppe (Nov 18)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 18)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 18)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 20)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Jim Young (Nov 20)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 24)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Alexander Koeppe (Nov 26)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 26)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Cristian Constantin (Nov 14)
- Re: tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs Martin Mathieson (Nov 12)