tcp graphs vs. sctp graphs

[Cristian Constantin <const.crist () googlemail com>]

hi!

I am just a bit confused about the way the tcp graphs are presented to the
user.
I am using debian/Version 1.6.5

1. tcp. if one selects (for example):

Statistics/TCP Stream Graph/Window Scaling Graph

from the main menu, one gets the graph from the perspective of the endpoint
which is
represented by source ip address, source ip port of the frame containing
the tcp segment
selected in the main wireshark window, right?
for getting the graph for the other endpoint, I have to close the current
graph and select a tcp
segment with the source ip/port of the other endpoint and select again:

Statistics/TCP Stream Graph/Window Scaling Graph

wouldn't have been more intuitive and easier to use (from the user
perspective) changing the
graph dynamically when another source endpoint is selected in the main
window? or to present
such a choice in the tcp graph windows?

2. sctp. I find the way the graphs are presented to the user much more
intuitive and easier to use
(i.e. _explicitly_ per endpoint of the association). for example, choosing
from the main menu:

Telephony/SCTP/Show All Associations...

then selecting the association from the popped-up window and then
requesting the
graphs per _endpoint_.

(i.e. "Analyse" button in the "SCTP Associations" window, then choosing the
endpoint tab in the
"SCTP Analyse Association" window and then pressing one of the graph
buttons)

cristian

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe