Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Enhance checkapi to check for non NULL terminated enum preferenses (enum_val_t)


From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:35:22 +0000


Thanks a million Jeff. 

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: den 29 november 2012 21:27
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Enhance checkapi to check for non NULL terminated enum preferenses (enum_val_t)

Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
Any one up for the task? :-)
 
I recently ran in to a crash caused by a proprietary plug-in with the 
above error.
Packet-amr.c could be used for test.
A check in prefs_dlg.c wouldn't hurt either...

checkAPIs change done in r46294 (along with, as I'm sure you saw, a check to ensure they're all const).

I'd shy away from a run-time check just to save (startup) cycles.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: