Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: ATM over Ethernet
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:26:23 +0100
Hi, On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:14:31PM +0000, Alex Bennee wrote:
We use a fairly simple ATM over Ethernet encapsulation for linking old ATM based circuits with modern Ethernet based hardware.
Googling for 0x8884 I has found that it's already defined as ETH_P_ATMFATE (full name: Frame-based ATM Transport over Ethernet) and there's some specification at http://www.broadband-forum.org/ftp/pub/approved-specs/af-fbatm-0139.001.pdf Is this the same protocol? If yes maybe dissector should be called FATE rather than ATMoE? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- ATM over Ethernet Alex Bennee (Nov 05)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Guy Harris (Nov 05)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Alex Bennée (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Alex Bennée (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Guy Harris (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Alex Bennée (Nov 07)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Evan Huus (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Anders Broman (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Guy Harris (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Alex Bennée (Nov 06)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Guy Harris (Nov 05)
- Re: ATM over Ethernet Alex Bennée (Nov 07)