Wireshark mailing list archives
Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:02:19 +0200
There's nothing new to the packet_list code in there any more ;-) Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Guy Harris (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)
- Re: Should gtk/new_packet_list.[hc] be renamed to gtk/packet_list.[hc]? Guy Harris (Sep 03)