Re: Wireshark 1.8.1 Duplicate protocol name

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:03:32PM +0000, Paul Ring wrote:
> So, what I found was that I had to remove a number of plug-ins to get it to
>  run. I basically did a grep in  the plugin directory looking for GIOP.  BTW, 
> the directory is:
..
> Not sure what functionality I'll lose moving this plugins, but at least it's
>  running.  Sure I'll find out what  I'm  missing later :)

Most likely you loose nothing, because IIRC these dissectors were changed from
plugins to builtin dissectors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r42974 | etxrab | 2012-06-01 17:57:05 +0200 (Fr, 01 Jun 2012) | 1 line

Make packet-coseventcomm.c a bultin dissector
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ciao
      Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe