Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Building for Windows without zlib?
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:48:37 +0000 (UTC)
Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:
However, a file larger than 2GB might has enough packets that the frame_data
structures might fill up a
32-bit address space, and there's a bug, fixed only recently, where, at least
on Windows, we were imposing
32-bit limits on 64-bit address spaces.
FYI, the bug Guy is referencing is https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5979, and the fix is scheduled for 1.8.3 and 1.6.11. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Building for Windows without zlib? Martin Mathieson (Sep 27)
- Re: Building for Windows without zlib? Jakub Zawadzki (Sep 27)
- Re: Building for Windows without zlib? Guy Harris (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Building for Windows without zlib? robert . bullen (Sep 28)
- Re: Building for Windows without zlib? Guy Harris (Sep 28)
- Re: Building for Windows without zlib? Christopher Maynard (Sep 28)
- Re: Building for Windows without zlib? Guy Harris (Sep 28)