Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Fuzz-bot Valgrind


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:33:59 -0400

Well, at least it seems to be running correctly with and without tree now.
Part of r50895 probably fixed it by accident somehow...


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't working at all, even apart
from the weird only-one-set-of-arguments bug that we never tracked
down. I just grabbed a chunk of the menagerie and ran fuzz-test -g on
it myself and I'm finding way too many errors for this to be just me
getting lucky.

This suggests, however, that if we were to fix it we would be flooded
in fuzz failures...

Evan

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: