Re: Fuzz-bot Valgrind

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

However, looking more closely at the times: there is *no way* given the
size of our menagerie, that it should be valgrinding the entire thing in
under half an hour (
http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Clang-Code-Analysis/builds/2061
).

I added another tweak in 51300 that might give a clue what's going on.
Gerald, is it possible that valgrind isn't in the PATH or doesn't have
execute permission for the fuzz-bot's environment/user? Something like that
might explain the 1/2-hour time, since then valgrind would never be run at
all...


On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

> Well, at least it seems to be running correctly with and without tree now.
> Part of r50895 probably fixed it by accident somehow...
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't working at all, even apart
> > from the weird only-one-set-of-arguments bug that we never tracked
> > down. I just grabbed a chunk of the menagerie and ran fuzz-test -g on
> > it myself and I'm finding way too many errors for this to be just me
> > getting lucky.
> >
> > This suggests, however, that if we were to fix it we would be flooded
> > in fuzz failures...
> >
> > Evan
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe