Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Get_cpu_info on platforms other than Windows?


From: Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:53:12 +0100

Guy Harris skrev 2013-02-06 22:52:
On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu> wrote:

Why do we need to show system information in Wireshark which is
available in system specific tools which are better suited for this
task?
It *might* be interesting for performance questions if

        1) the user submits a bug and provides the configuration information

or

        2) it's easier to get them to open About -> Wireshark than to figure up whatever tool is appropriate on their 
particular OS or to otherwise get the CPU information.

However, there's other information that might be useful, such as bus speeds, memory speeds, etc.; I doubt we want to 
gather a ton of information about that.

I don't see it as being useful for crashing bugs or mis-dissection bugs or....

*Memory* size might be useful not just for performance bugs but also, in combination with swap-space size, could be 
useful for out-of-memory bugs.
Yes that's the reasoning behind it, printing the OS version (lsb_release -a) might be interesting too but that
seems even trickier.
Regards
Anders
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: