Wireshark mailing list archives
newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking
From: 温金超 <wenjinchao0418 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:41:49 +0800
Hi guys, Is should be *three-way handshaking* or not when trying to establishe a new connection? but I tcpdump following: 19:23:12.688758 IP 10.1.164.64.51350 > 10.13.220.4.80: S 3779651860:3779651860(0) win 8192 <mss 1260,nop,wscale 8,nop,nop,sackOK> *19:23:12.688776 IP 10.13.220.4.80 > 10.1.164.64.51350: S4133937230:4133937230(0) ack 3779651861 win 5840 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 9>* *19:23:12.688779 IP 10.13.220.4.80 > 10.1.164.64.51350: S4133937230:4133937230(0) ack 3779651861 win 5840 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 9>* 19:23:12.689716 IP 10.1.164.64.51350 > 10.13.220.4.80: . ack 1 win 260 10.13.220.4 ack twice for syn. any idea ? Thanks for any suggesstion. jinchao
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Guy Harris (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Shain Singh (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Jaap Keuter (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 22)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Jaap Keuter (Jan 22)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 22)