Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking
From: 温金超 <wenjinchao0418 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:18:06 +0800
Hi, I got it. Thanks a lot. jinchao 2013/1/23 Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Well, then obviously you are capturing *below* the bonded interface. Therefore the *outgoing* frames are seen twice, one for each physical interface, and the *incoming* frames once, because they come from a switch, which uses a single port to send the frame[*]. You can't really fall back to capturing a single physical interface (eth0, eth1) because you do not know where the switch will send the returned frames. To get rid of the duplicates you can either: 1) capture on the bonding interface (bond0 or whatever name it takes) 2) use editcap -d to remove the duplicates from the capture file afterwards. [*] unless flooding, multicast, MAC table miss.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Guy Harris (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Shain Singh (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Jaap Keuter (Jan 21)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 22)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking Jaap Keuter (Jan 22)
- Re: newbie question about tcp three-way handshaking 温金超 (Jan 22)