Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
From: "Ewgenij Sokolovski" <ewgenijkkg () gmx de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:16:05 +0100
"wireshark" the wrapper script or "wireshark" the program that gets installed when you do "make install"?
The program that gets installed when I do "make install". The problem is that my dissector is not a plugin but a built-in one. The source code is in asn1/ directory. Thus, it should be loaded not dependant on whether Wireshark is run from build directory or not. Or do I misunderstand anything? BR Ewgenij ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 14)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)