Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark

[Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>]

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Ewgenij 
Sokolovski
Sent: den 11 januari 2013 11:16
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark

> > "wireshark" the wrapper script or "wireshark" the program that gets 
> > installed when you do "make install"?
>
> The program that gets installed when I do "make install".
>
> The problem is that my dissector is not a plugin but a built-in one. The source code is in asn1/ directory. 
> Thus, it should be loaded not dependant on whether Wireshark is run from build directory or not. Or do I 
> misunderstand anything?

When creating the source code by running (n)make (using asn2wrs) the source code should be copied to the 
../dissectors/Directory(automatically) and the file packet-foo.[ch] should be part of Makefile.common in that dir and 
CMakeLists.txt in ../epan or added to Custom.common.

Regards
Anders

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe