Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 50967: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: proto.c
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 08:33:49 -0400
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:47 AM, <darkjames () wireshark org> wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=50967 User: darkjames Date: 2013/07/28 03:47 AM Log: Store protocol fields in single linked list, saves about 1 MB of memory. Directory: /trunk/epan/ Changes Path Action +12 -11 proto.c Modified
Neat. I was poking through this change and I noticed that all three places that call proto_unregister_field (which is very inefficient at the moment, possibly traversing the entire linked list twice) do so in a loop for all their hfs, so I was wondering if it makes sense to replace it with a proto_unregister_all_fields that just removes the whole list? I'm not sure if we want to leave proto_unregister_field around or not in case somebody actually needs it in the future - the data structures aren't really designed for that operation. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 50967: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: proto.c Evan Huus (Jul 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 50967: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: proto.c Jakub Zawadzki (Jul 29)