Wireshark mailing list archives
Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:54:38 -0700
As per the subject, as of revision 50020. If I've missed an API somewhere please let me know, but as far as I can tell every function defined in emem.h has a wmem equivalent. This means that unless there are any objections, emem is now deprecated. New code should only use wmem. Most of the APIs are fairly similar, and doc/README.wmem provides a good overview of how wmem differs from emem and how to use it. I'm sure there are things I've missed or explained poorly, so please feel free to email if you have any questions after reading the docs. I will start converting existing emem calls to wmem - I expect most of it will be regexable. Cheers, Evan ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 18)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 20)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)