Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Lightweight markup for release notes


From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:17:29 -0700

On 3/4/13 3:39 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 3/4/13 2:33 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
On 03/04/2013 08:45 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
Would anyone object to using a lighter-weight markup language for the
release notes such as Markdown or reStructuredText?

I myself have been looking into AsciiDoc, for use with the Users and Developers
Guide. It seems to me that the two projects you mentioned are a bit stale?
AsciiDoc seems more capable of being used throughout as Wireshark's
documentation format, maybe.

Markdown and reStructuredText are used in a wide variety if places, e.g.
GitHub, Stack Exchange, Python (documentation), and our Q&A site.

The specifications themselves are a different story. Markdown in
particular has fragmented a bit, which has caused a bit of concern:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/10/the-future-of-markdown.html

Asciidoc let me create ws-buglink:<bug number> and cve-idlink:<CVE
number> macros, which was enough to get me to use it. I switched the
release notes over in r48307.

BTW, It looks like Asciidoc and Sphinx both have blockdiag extensions,
which opens up interesting possibilities for network and packet
diagrams: http://blockdiag.com/en/nwdiag/
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: