Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53473: /trunk/ui/ /trunk/ui/gtk/: main_menubar.c /trunk/ui/qt/: main_window_slots.cpp


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:46:06 -0500

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:25 AM,  <mmann78 () netscape net> wrote:
Of the ones I needed/interested in ("eth", "ip", "ipv6", "tcp", "udp",
"sctp") only "ip" had its proto_* variable in a header (in the dissectors
directory).  Am I looking in the wrong place?

Oh, OK I thought TCP/UDP were already public as well, but I guess only
IP has been needed so far.

Do you think that's something
I should add for the other dissectors?  I know string compares are more
expensive than integers, but I don't believe the integers are available.  I
also don't want to establish precendence and have dissectors think they need
the proto_* variable to be public.

I don't see any specific reason to keep the proto_ variables private,
so I have no objection to making them available. All of the protocols
involved in this case already have separate header files anyways.

I'm almost tempted to create a separate file just for the proto_
variables so that any code that needs to manipulate protocol IDs
doesn't have to include a bunch of different headers, but I think
that's overkill at this point.

The string list to look through is rarely larger than 6 or 7 so I'm not sure
the performance hit will be noticeable.

Ya, I was just thinking it would be simpler to be able to do a straight ==.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
To: wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Sent: Thu, Nov 21, 2013 7:27 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 53473: /trunk/ui/
/trunk/ui/gtk/: main_menubar.c /trunk/ui/qt/: main_window_slots.cpp

Rather than doing string comparisons you should just be able to compare the
value directly to the proto_* variable for the relevant protocol. Most of
the
necessary ones should already be I'm public headers.

On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:16 AM, mmann () wireshark org wrote:

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53473

User: mmann
Date: 2013/11/21 12:16 PM

Log:
Walk list of protocol strings to determine which protocols are present in
a
packet rather than rely on protocol specific items in packet_info in an
effort
to (eventually) reduce packet_info members.

Directory: /trunk/ui/gtk/
 Changes    Path              Action
 +69 -20    main_menubar.c    Modified

Directory: /trunk/ui/qt/
 Changes    Path                     Action
 +40 -16    main_window_slots.cpp    Modified


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list
<wireshark-commits () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits

mailto:wireshark-commits-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: