Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>]

On 11/22/13 13:26, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
> Hello all,
> obviously from several levels ""SCCP XUDT  reassembly" does not control
> reassembly of {X,L}UDT but also of DT1s, shouldn't the corresponding
> parameter under preferences be adjuster or maybe better yet -- introduce
> several -- one for {L,X}UDT, another one for DT{1.2}?

I'm not sure why we'd need 2 preferences: it seems unlikely someone 
would want to reassemble XUDTs but not reassemble DT1s.

But I see your point that the interface is misleading; I updated the 
preference text (and a bit more) in r53576.  That change will show up in 
the next development version (1.11.3) and the next stable version (1.12.0?).

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe