Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained
From: Ariel Burbaickij <ariel.burbaickij () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:04:33 +0100
OK, thank you for the update. Maybe it would be a good idea to clean the corresponding code in packet-sccp.c too :). Actually, both methods are fine with me, i.e option being labeled "Reassembly UDT/DT1/etc." or to have separate ones for each type. Actually, one case where it might be useful is during some type acceptance or torture testing. Now, do you have something to say about the actual process of reassembly in case of DT1, as I wrote in my second e-mail? It is not very clear to me in all details how it happens. /wbr Ariel Burbaickij On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>wrote:
On 11/22/13 13:26, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:Hello all, obviously from several levels ""SCCP XUDT reassembly" does not control reassembly of {X,L}UDT but also of DT1s, shouldn't the corresponding parameter under preferences be adjuster or maybe better yet -- introduce several -- one for {L,X}UDT, another one for DT{1.2}?I'm not sure why we'd need 2 preferences: it seems unlikely someone would want to reassemble XUDTs but not reassemble DT1s. But I see your point that the interface is misleading; I updated the preference text (and a bit more) in r53576. That change will show up in the next development version (1.11.3) and the next stable version (1.12.0?). ____________________________________________________________ _______________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject= unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Ariel Burbaickij (Nov 22)
- Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Jeff Morriss (Nov 25)
- Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Ariel Burbaickij (Nov 25)
- Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Jeff Morriss (Nov 25)