Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:04 PM, ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg () gmail com> wrote:

> There is very little overlap between samba needs and wireshark needs for PIDL.
> It is probably better to continue running two separate forks of PIDL,
> one for samba and one for wireshark.
>
> Switching to samba PIDL seems to be a lot of work for miniscule gain.
> And who will do the work?

Are you referring to forking PIDL, the language, or to forking PIDL, the tool that translates PIDL-the-language 
descriptions into code for {Samba,Wireshark,...}?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe