Re: LTE-RRC doesn't compile cleanly in master-1.10

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

Ya, it's usable in 1.10 though it's not as efficient or featureful. It couldn't fully replace emem at that point, but 
for one-off use (backporting?) it should work just fine.

Switching it back to emem would also probably work with no ill-effects. Whatever's easier.

Evan

> On Apr 10, 2014, at 10:02 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:
>
> The warning-turned-error (I like to compile the branches with warnings-as-errors to catch this kind of thing) is:
>
> >  CC       libdissectors_la-packet-lte-rrc.lo
> > ../../asn1/lte-rrc/packet-lte-rrc-fn.c: In function 'dissect_lte_rrc_SystemInfoListGERAN_item':
> > ../../asn1/lte-rrc/packet-lte-rrc-fn.c:13442:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'wmem_alloc' 
> > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../../asn1/lte-rrc/packet-lte-rrc-fn.c:13442:22: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size 
> > [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > make[5]: *** [libdissectors_la-packet-lte-rrc.lo] Error 1
>
> Normally I'd just add an include of wmem.h but is wmem ready for use in the 1.10 branch?  I thought not but maybe I'm 
> mis-remembering.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe