Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] master 7b7dd1e: Don't use -1 as the length of an integer.


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:45:34 -0400

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

On Aug 18, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

Guy, how are you finding these last four or five API abuses? Do you
have some sort of super-checkAPIs or are you just doing a lot of
manual code review?

No, and not exactly.

I have my regression script, which I was using to check whether I'd broken anything with the X11 changes; it runs two 
versions of tshark against a file, and compares the results.  It runs against a big collection of captures, including 
the menagerie used for fuzz testing.

It *also* captures the standard error of tshark in both cases, and reports it regardless of whether it's different or 
not, so it catches dissector bug messages.

Hmm - should the fuzz script raise an error when it detects anything
on stderr? We'd probably catch a lot of things that way.

I then do the code review on the dissectors that are issuing bug messages.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: