Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Heuristic check of T.125 dissector


From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:01:18 -0800

Wireshark has lots of reverse engineered protocols. So that should not stop you.

For example, the whole CIFS/SMB family of protocols used to be reverse
engineered, eventhough now in later times the documentation to those
protocols are now available so errors in the decoding can be fixed.


If the dissector is useful to others, then if it is based on reverse
engineering instead of official documentation,   include it.
An incomplete, reverse engineered, dissector is better than no dissector at all.


ronnie sahlberg


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Thomas Wiens <th.wiens () gmx de> wrote:

Without knowing the protocol, I'd say there's almost always room for
improvement.  Open a bug with a sample capture and see if someone can
figure out how to strengthen the check.

Ok, thanks. I will open a bug request then.

ps. you mentioned your dissector is hosted on sourceforge; would you
consider submitting it to Wireshark?

The dissector is of a proprietary protocol which is completely reverse
engineered. There is no official documentation available.
The protocol is used in programmable logic controlles by Siemens, I
think the most common vendor in Europe for those controllers.

I don't know if there are other reverse engineered protocols in
wireshark, but for myself I would like when the delivered plugins with
wireshark refer to official documents or rfcs, and not guessed as my
dissector.
Is there a official wireshark point of view?

The website is:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/s7commwireshark/

There are some sample captures available.

--
Regards
Thomas Wiens



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: