Re: do we continue to reference revision numbers?

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

I believe the standard is typically to use the abbreviated SHA of the
commit (first 8-10 chars is usually enough to guarantee uniqueness). I
don't know whether bugzilla currently auto-links such text, but
presumably it can be configured.

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Hadriel Kaplan
<hadriel.kaplan () oracle com> wrote:
> In the past with svn, when we found a bug caused by a previous code change, we used the revision number in bugzilla 
> comments with a  leading 'r', like 'r12345'.  This would auto-create a very convenient url link in bugzilla to the 
> svn browsing web pages.  Now that we're on git, do we:
> 1) continue to use revision numbers?  or do we use commit ids? or change-ids?
> 2) continue to use 'r[number]' in bugzilla, or some new syntax?
>
> -hadriel
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe