Re: do we continue to reference revision numbers?

[Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>]

Any specific leading character(s) we should use, so that bugzilla can someday parse it and insert the appropriate url?
Like ‘c[commit_id_sha1]'

-hadriel


On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu> wrote:

> Hi Hadriel,
>
> 2014-01-31 Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>:
> > In the past with svn, when we found a bug caused by a previous code change, we used the revision number in bugzilla 
> > comments with a  leading ‘r’, like ‘r12345’.  This would auto-create a very convenient url link in bugzilla to the 
> > svn browsing web pages.  Now that we’re on git, do we:
> > 1) continue to use revision numbers?  or do we use commit ids? or change-ids?
> > 2) continue to use ‘r[number]’ in bugzilla, or some new syntax?
> Please use commit ids of commits which are already part of the
> branches. (After having them "Submit"-ted in Gerrit.)
>
> Cheers,
> Balint
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe