Re: [Wireshark-announce] Wireshark 1.12.0rc3 is now available

[Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>]

On 31 July 2014 17:34, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:

> On 7/31/14 6:08 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> > On 31 July 2014 11:42, Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu
> > <mailto:balint () balintreczey hu>> wrote:
> >
> >     +1 for dropping autotools in favor of CMake. CMake already covers all
> >     my use cases.
>
> Same here except for Windows. I've been doing most of my Qt development
> using Qt Creator + CMake. It doesn't have all the conveniences of Qt
> Creator + QMake but it works well enough.
>
> >     I also support dropping nmake, but since I'm not building on Windows
> I
> >     can't tell if CMake is complete enough.
> >
> > Not yet.  Working on it though.
>
> I added "msbuild" steps to the Windows buildslaves after the "cmake"
> steps. The 32-bit build succeeds although I haven't tried running it.
> The 64-bit build passes /MACHINE:X86 to the linker which then fails.
I'm not that happy about CMake's handling of x86/amd64 issues.  It should
be able to emit a VS .sln that handles both types of builds, but I haven't
yet looked into what's needed to make that work.


-- 
Graham Bloice

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe