Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-announce] Wireshark 1.12.0rc3 is now available


From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:19:27 +0100

On 31 July 2014 22:14, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com> wrote:

On 31 July 2014 17:34, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:

On 7/31/14 6:08 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 31 July 2014 11:42, Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu
<mailto:balint () balintreczey hu>> wrote:

    +1 for dropping autotools in favor of CMake. CMake already covers
all
    my use cases.

Same here except for Windows. I've been doing most of my Qt development
using Qt Creator + CMake. It doesn't have all the conveniences of Qt
Creator + QMake but it works well enough.

    I also support dropping nmake, but since I'm not building on
Windows I
    can't tell if CMake is complete enough.

Not yet.  Working on it though.

I added "msbuild" steps to the Windows buildslaves after the "cmake"
steps. The 32-bit build succeeds although I haven't tried running it.
The 64-bit build passes /MACHINE:X86 to the linker which then fails.


The buildslaves are failing to build the solution.  I think the arguments
to the msbuild step should be modified to be "msbuild" "/m"
"/p:Configuration=RelWithDebInfo" "Wireshark.sln".



And the x86 buildslave CMake still isn't locating a viable Python
Interpreter.



-- 
Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: