Wireshark mailing list archives
Stateless Dissection
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 17:07:19 -0400
After Kurt's recent post I dug up an old patch I'd played with and cleaned it up a bit. It still needs some work (documentation at the very least) but [1] should add a -Z option to tshark which turns on "stateless" dissection. You lose reassembly and all that, but you should get no memory growth at all. The implementation is a bit of a hack in that stateless dissection still does all the stateful work, it just throws it away after each packet (so stateless is actually slightly slower than stateful) but it seems to work in my simple tests. Does this seem useful to people? Ideas for a better flag (Z just happened to be handy)? Other thoughts, comments, suggestions? [1] https://code.wireshark.org/review/2559
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 26)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Kurt Knochner (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)