Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Stateless Dissection
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 23:25:37 +0200
Hi Evan, On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 05:07:19PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
The implementation is a bit of a hack in that stateless dissection still does all the stateful work, it just throws it away after each packet (so stateless is actually slightly slower than stateful) but it seems to work in my simple tests. Does this seem useful to people? Ideas for a better flag (Z just happened to be handy)? Other thoughts, comments, suggestions?
Great, but I'd like to see also something working for *given* frame number, this would also fix issues with -R (like remove all conversations, reassemblies created by *given* frame number). About flag, I'd suggest -0 (zero-pass) ;-) Cheers, Jakub ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 26)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Jakub Zawadzki (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Kurt Knochner (Jun 22)
- Re: Stateless Dissection Evan Huus (Jun 22)