Re: Update Windows Build Instructions

[Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>]

On 1/5/15 10:02 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
> On 5 January 2015 at 17:35, Stephen Fisher <sfisher () sdf org
> <mailto:sfisher () sdf org>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:20:27PM +0000, Graham Bloice wrote:
>
>     > Yes, use CMake :-)
>     >
>     > There are other cross-platform build solutions such as SCons, but it's
>     > just as bad as CMake (or maybe worse, I haven't tried anything other
>     > than a toy project).
>     >
>     > Adding a dissector to CMake is as simple as it is for nmake with the
>     > bonus that it works for both Windows and Linux (and wherever else
>     > CMake is used).  Doing anything else with the CMake build system
>     > requires a lot of head scratching as getting the required output from
>     > the arcane language of CMake files can be a battle.
>
>     With such a glowing review as that.. I'm not sure I want to try CMake :)
>     Perhaps it would be better to handle the different platform build
>     methods ourselves.
>
>
> It's the least worst option.  It is actively used elsewhere though.
>
> We've handled the platform differences in the past by using make and
> nmake and autofoo and other piles of configuration grief.

Note that "Nmake" in our case is actually "Nmake plus QMake". We could
create a ui/qt/Makefile.nmake with the required moc, rcc, uic, and
compiler commands but the effort would probably be better spent on
bringing the CMake configuration to 100% completion. I'll send a
separate email about that shortly.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe