Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Qt: Convert ProtoTree from QTreeWidget to Model/View


From: Peter Wu <peter () lekensteyn nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:14:12 +0100

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:19:20PM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 3/9/15 1:32 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:44:21AM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
On 3/9/15 7:56 AM, Peter Wu wrote:
Hi,

I have recently discovered that the Qt UI gets in an inconsistent state
(leading to crashes) whenever a packet dialog is open and packets are
re-dissected. This is reported at
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11044

Before proceeding to a reimplementation attempt using Model/View, I
would like to solicit for some feedback. Was the QTreeWidget choice done
consciously? Do you foresee issues with sharing field items via the same
model? Is someone already working on this?

A QTreeWidget was chosen lazily, i.e. it did the job at the time. A custom
model might make more sense given that we have a large limit on the number
of tree items (MAX_TREE_ITEMS = 1e6).

Having independent models lets each packet dialog persist across files.
Would a shared model still allow that?

As far as I know, you can only have one open capture file. Correct me if
I am wrong.

That's correct. That's also *exactly* why many of the Qt dialogs catch
captureFileClosing and disconnect themselves from the current capture file.
If a user wants packet dialogs from multiple capture files spread across
multiple monitors I'm not going to question her motives.

So was your comment more like a wishlist feature or did you mean
persistence across packet selections?

Both File sets and opening files manually result in all packet dialogs
getting closed after opening a new capture (v1.99.4rc0-34-g6bc138c).
This is the current GTK+ implementation,

This is annoying behavior, IMHO.

Qt crashes for the reasons mentioned in bug 11044.

...as is this. :)

Well, "closing" a capture file should also close other dialogs right? Or
are you pointing at the File sets feature?

File sets are quite a strange feature by the way. Using dumpcap -b
files:3 -b duration:5 I was unable to make wireshark recognize a file
set by opening the first one from the set. Must be me... ;)
-- 
Kind regards,
Peter Wu
https://lekensteyn.nl
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: