Re: Removing ADNS

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

Hi,

If anything we could consider adding unbound(*) instead.

Thanks,
Jaap

(*) Bug 4018 <https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4018> [PATCH] libunbound integration for async DNS 
resolution


> On 01 May 2015, at 12:41, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:16:00AM -0800, Gerald Combs wrote:
> > Does anyone link Wireshark with GNU ADNS? If not I'd like to drop
> > support for it in master. The current version (1.5.0) switched licenses
> > from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ and prior versions don't support IPv6.
>
> IIRC c-ares has been the preferred lib for doing this for a long time now,
> so I don't mind killing off adns completely.
> Less #ifdef stuff in the source as well :-)
>
> +1
>
> Ciao
>      Jörg
>
> -- 
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe