Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Compiling Wireshark with gcc-6: Lots of new warnings


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:05:49 -0800


On Jan 11, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com> wrote:

About unused-const-variable, it is already enable when use clang and clang don't found this warning...
after a check, it is only from const define on .h file.. and when look .c file, the const is used...
false positive ? need to include .c file on .h ? i have don't yet search if it is already known issue with gcc

I addressed the first warning of that sort with

        https://code.wireshark.org/review/13198

by moving the *definition* out of the header into a source file, leaving only a *declaration* in the header.  That way, 
you don't get unused tables in compilers that don't optimize it out and you don't get warnings from GCC.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: