Wireshark mailing list archives
small vs large patch sets ?
From: Bertin Nicolas <nicolas.bertin () al-enterprise com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:11:30 +0000
Hi, I'm updating 2 dissectors (packet-noe and packet-ua3g). So far, I've submitted changes one by one (small patches). I believe it's the preferred solution for reviewers instead of a large patch with everything in it. Can you confirm? Until now, I've wait for a patch to be merged before submitting the next one. My workflow is probably wrong... Is there a better way of doing thing?
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- small vs large patch sets ? Bertin Nicolas (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Pascal Quantin (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Roland Knall (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Michael Mann (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Pascal Quantin (Apr 19)