Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: small vs large patch sets ?
From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:18:05 +0200
Is there a better way of doing thing?You can push all patches with the same topic, and they will be reviewed one after each other.
Gerrit also allows an easy rebase of patchsets, so one patchset can be rebased while others stay the same. Take a look at "git review" which also eases the handling of patches on the command-line. UI Tools like GItExtensions for Windows have git-review integration support, which helps quite a lot Cheers, Roland
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- small vs large patch sets ? Bertin Nicolas (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Pascal Quantin (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Roland Knall (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Michael Mann (Apr 19)
- Re: small vs large patch sets ? Pascal Quantin (Apr 19)