Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Conditional compiles
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:48:45 -0800
On Feb 13, 2017, at 4:53 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:
To me it looks like HAVE_LIBPCAP would be a candidate to solve somehow, as it is regularly involved when compiles break without this define. Would it maybe make sense so include a dummy version inside Wireshark that basically does (mostly) nothing?
To what extent is it important that it be possible to build a version of Wireshark without packet capture capabilities? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Conditional compiles Joerg Mayer (Feb 13)
- Re: Conditional compiles Guy Harris (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Roland Knall (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Dario Lombardo (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Jeff Morriss (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Dario Lombardo (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Roland Knall (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Roland Knall (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Guy Harris (Feb 14)
- Re: Conditional compiles Joerg Mayer (Feb 14)