Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Overview of MPLS PW bugs


From: Francesco Fondelli <francesco.fondelli () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:10:16 +0100

Hi Guy,

https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/19599/

change 19599 is an attempt to improve the situation. It is a work in progress.

- The code that takes into consideration padding can be done better
for IPv4 (line 497).
- I suspect the IPv6 case (line 510) is wrong because the ip6len is
not the total len.

I tested this change against traces found in bug 13301 and "it works",
I also tested this with plain IPv4 encapsulated in MPLS and "it
works".

Any help is appreciated.
thanks
ciao
fra

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
[cut]
and the captures in that bug may be real rather than synthesized (some obscure companies named "Cisco" and "Huawei" 
has OUIs that have 4 as the first nibble and some obscure companies named "Hewlett-Packard" and "Juniper" has OUIs 
that have 6 as the first nibble).

believe me I am very aware of that :-)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: