Re: hf_http_response_code in packet-http.c

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

Hi all,

I remember a similar discussion around the Contents-Length header some years ago. 
Can’t we make a similar solution here? Then everyone will be happy and we have a backwards compatible solution.

Thanks,
Jaap


> On 13 Jul 2017, at 22:41, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > As Eric explained, having the HTTP response code as a number simply gives you
> > much more advantages (filtering, comparisons, inequalities...) than having it in
> > text. So this is clearly not a bug as it was done on purpose.
>
> I agree it's not a bug. For the existing purpose of Wireshark it does the job. It just makes some other use-cases a 
> bit more difficult.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe