Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: hf_http_response_code in packet-http.c


From: Erik de Jong <erikdejong () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 07:11:58 +0200

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev <
wireshark-dev () wireshark org> wrote:

Hi,



I am starting to learn the Wireshark code base, and one thing puzzles me…



Why is hf_http_response_code defined as a FT_UINT16 with BASE_DEC rather
than an FT_STRING ?



It’s a text field… not an integer.


Presenting it as a number allows for filtering like:
http.response.code > 200
Which would not be possible when presented as a string.



Anyone can enlighten me ? For the beginner that I am this looks like a
bug, even though the display properly represent the http response code.
Happy to send a patch if that’s case, just want to check first…



Regards,



Hassan Sultan

____________________________________________________________
_______________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=
unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: